Showing posts with label Video. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Video. Show all posts

Sunday, April 20, 2008

'Best-Value' Draft Picks: Workhorse Back Edition

This is the latest addition to my 'best-value' series which began with this article on the 2008 defensive tackle class. Recall, when we talk about 'best-value,' we are referring to a players quality and price. Thus, Jonathan Stewart might be the highest quality running back on your board, but as an early 1st-round pick, his price is also among the highest in the draft.

In a recent article on Selvin Young, we discovered the following:

  • 23% of Denver's running plays were for 10+ yards (a large amount).

  • Denver was ranked 32nd in the NFL in Power Success Percentage, the percentage of 2nd/3rd/4th-and-less-than-2 plays that resulted in first downs or touchdowns.

  • Denver was 20th in the league in Stuffed Percentage, the percentage of running plays which resulted in zero yardage or negative yards.

  • Selvin Young ranked 40th and Travis Henry ranked 27th in Success Percentage, a statistic which tabulates "success" or "fail" for each run dependent on the down and distance.


Overall, these numbers infer that in 2007 Denver mixed long runs with downs getting stuffed at the line of scrimmage. What's more, I argued that Denver was horribly deficient in blitz protection and pass protection from the running back position. This conclusion is, in part, based on the 8.5 sacks tabulated in this article. Based on this information, we can conclude the following about Denver's running attack:

  • The loss of Lepsis, Hamilton, Nalen, and Henry (for most of the year) dealt a painful blow to our rushing attack in 2007. Denver will likely benefit from the return of at least half this cast (assuming a minimum of either Hamilton or Henry make it back).

  • Denver needs to inject some youth into the offensive line in this year's draft. Right tackle and guard are the principle areas of need.

  • Denver could use a third down back with better pass-blocking and route-running ability than Selvin Young, although, Selvin was serviceable in the role given his 10+ yard run tally.

  • Denver needs a workhorse back to fix its power running game. With Lepsis, Henry, Hamilton, and Nalen healthy after 4 weeks, Henry had zero touchdowns to show for his league-leading yardage. Denver's red zone touchdown percentage was among the worst its had in years, and the running game is a huge reason for this; more on this in a second.


This article will focus on the last item in the list: finding a workhorse back. What do I mean by a workhorse back? To tell the story, let's start with this table:


Three of these seasons--2002, 2003, and 2007--Denver has run the ball less than they've passed. Each of these seasons happens to be a statistical low in the percentage of plays which resulted in a first down and overall record. With respect to red zone touchdown percentage, 2004 seems to be a huge statistical anomaly, but I'm guessing Plummer's 21 turnovers were a contributing factor.

Now, let me draw your attention to this stat: to run the ball over 50% of the time, Denver is going to have to amass 500+ carries. Having a run defense is a big piece to accomplishing this goal. Equally as important is having a guy who can carry the rock 300+ times a season. Having one who can move a pile wouldn't hurt either. What kind of running back can stand up to this kind of workload? Well, since 2004, these are the guys who've done it in the NFL:



















PLAYER:WEIGHT:
Cad. Williams217
Chester Taylor213
Clinton Portis223
Corey Dillon225
Curtis Martin210
Domanick Davis221
Edgerrin James220
Frank Gore223
Jamal Lewis245
L. Tomlinson221
Larry Johnson230
LenDale White235
Reuben Droughns220
Rudi Johnson214
Shaun Alexander228
Steven Jackson232
Thomas Jones215
Tiki Barber205
Willie Parker209
Willis McGahee232


Over the three year period, there were 40 running backs who hit the 300-carry mark. If you consider injuries, there are 5 or more guys each year who were on a pace to achieve this mark. Last season, for instance, players like Ryan Grant (218 lbs), Brandon Jacobs (1572 lbs), Earnest Graham (225 lbs), Justin Fargas (220 lbs), Sammy Morris (220 lbs), Marshawn Lynch (215 lbs), Stephen Jackson, and Larry Johnson were all on pace to tally 300+ carries but failed to do so because they were injured or earned their jobs later in the year.

It's clear from this list that a 195-pound running back has virtually no chance of being a 300-carry back in the NFL. The average and median weight of this list is 221 pounds. Notice, Tiki Barber, Curtis Martin, and Willie Parker are the only backs who are 210 pounds or less. Taking Barber and Martin's best five-year production, both average 8 touchdowns per season. Willie Parker has averaged 6 touchdowns in 3 seasons as a starter, more than 75% of which came in a single 14-touchdown year. Brian Westbrook is the most liberally mentioned 'exception that disproves the rule.' In Westbrook's entire career, he's failed to amass more than 7 rushing touchdowns. He might be a great offensive weapon, but he's not going to bolster your red zone touchdown percentage.

So, what's the definition of a workhorse back? I hate to burst the bubble of all the Mike Hart, Felix Jones, and Chris Johnson fans out there, but a guy who's 195 to 205 pounds ain't it. To amass 300 carries, you really need to weigh about 215. Given these facts, my analysis is strongly biased in favor of backs who are greater than 5'10" and/or 210 pounds. Some of you will undoubtedly quarrel with this, but considering the paucity of sub-210 backs and the fact that only Frank Gore and Dominack Davis (the latter is out of the league due to injuries) are less than 5'10", these are fair assumptions in my opinion. Mind you, guys like Chris Johnson and Felix Jones could blossom in 200-carry backs and elite change-of-pace options in the NFL, but such considerations are outside the scope of this analysis.

Without further adieu, here's the list of my best-value picks:

#1: Rashard Mendenhall, Illinois: In today's era of unproven 1st-round draft picks earning pro-bowl money, it's hard to argue that any top pick is worthy of 'best-value' consideration. Even for #12 money, Mendenhall has got to make a value-addict like Shanahan salivate. Mendenhall has it all. He's got the rare combination of game-breaking speed and pile-driving power. He shows great vision, determination, and patience. He's an above-average pass protector with the toughness and size to anchor against the blitz. What's more, Mendenhall played in an offensive remarkably similar to Denver's in college. As a pure, one-cut back, Mendenhall is seemingly tailor made for Denver's offense and looks capable of immediately stepping in and making a huge impact in 2008.

#2: Cory Boyd, South Carolina: Boyd has overcome an astonishing amount of personal adversity to position himself as a 5th-round pick in this year's NFL draft. If you are interested in learning more, I strongly encourage you to read this article. Boyd was suspended for a year for violating team policy in 2005. Because of this, character and maturity are big concerns for NFL scouts; however, Boyd has no history of arrests or off-the-field problems. From a physical standpoint, Boyd is a complete package. He's got great acceleration and speed. He's got great size with the ability to add another 5 to 10 pounds. He's a fantastic pass blocker. Boyd plays with passion and vigor. He's a punishing runner who shows both elusiveness in space as well as the ability to break tackles. Boyd runs right through arm tackles and will likely mow over most of the DB's in the NFL. I once saw Boyd hit a Virginia defender so hard he gave him a seizure.

#3: Matt Forte, Tulane: A north-south runner, Matt Forte is not a very elusive player. There's also some concern about the level of competition he faced at Tulane. Other than these concerns, there's not much to dislike about Forte. He's a powerful runner with the ability to move the pile. He never stops moving his legs. Forte is an ideal fit in a system like Denver's that relies on a lot of two-tight-end, one-back sets. For 4th-round money, Forte is a great value.

#4: Jonathan Stewart, Oregon: This ranking will undoubtedly draw the ire of many Broncos fans. In fairness, Stewart would probably be near or at the top of a list of top change-of-pace backs available in this year's draft. Thus, I think the argument can be made for Stewart at #12 next month. The big question mark surrounding Stewart is whether or not he figures as a workhorse back in the NFL. At 235 pounds there's no question that Stewart has the size; however, Stewart was frequently bogged down with nagging injuries during his career at Oregon. To his credit, he showed a tendency to play through most of these injuries. Stewart is not the solution for our power-running game either. He tends to avoid contact and hasn't shown the ability to move a pile. He's also a poor pass protector. Despite Stewart's mismatches with Denver's primary needs, his speed, elusiveness, and game-breaking ability are unsurpassed in this year's draft. Stewart is a special talent deserving of consideration on this list, even though I've serious doubts about his ability to ever be a true 'workhorse' in the NFL.

#5: Alley Broussard, Louisiana State: Broussard had one of the most dominant performances in LSU Tigers history in 2004. Unfortunately, he tore his ACL in 2005 and missed the entire season. Returning from the injury in 2006, Broussard found himself buried on the LSU depth chart. After a year on the sidelines, he transferred to Missouri Southern State where he finished with 862 yards and 12 touchdowns. Broussard is a massive, punishing runner. He runs low to the ground and gets his shoulders underneath would-be tacklers. He doesn't have elite top-end speed but plays the game with quickness. Broussard is also a fantastic pass blocker. It's difficult to articulate Broussard's potential. Here's a video of his 2004 season at LSU:



An ACL injury is a two-year recovery plan. There is some question as to whether Broussard will ever return to pre-injury form; however, he'll get 7th round consideration or perhaps even go undrafted. For that kind of money, the risk is next to nothing, making him a great value.

Honorable Mention: Xavier Omon, Northwest Missouri State: The biggest knock against Omon is that he's a career D-II athlete. He is, however, the only player in D-II history to rush for 1,500 yards in four consecutive seasons. Omon has the size to be an every-down back in the NFL (5'10" 225lbs). He's also loaded with intangibles. Omon shows great patience and awareness. He's elusive in the open field and doesn't shy away from contact. Omon has great hands and is a capable route runner. He doesn't shy away from contact but the film I saw didn't show him taking any big-time hits. He's only an average pass blocker at a substandard level of competition. I immediately fell in love with Omon when I began this research but quickly lost interest the more I saw him on film. Omon has a good burst but his top-end speed is simply unacceptable. He utilizes running angles to avoid would-be tacklers astutely, but his consistent inability to outrun defenders leads me to believe that he'll be overwhelmed at the next level. Nevertheless, as a 7th round or undrafted talent, Omon is an intriguing talent who requires very little investment.

Shanahan has never drafted a running back in the first round. Mendenhall, however, is so rare a talent who is such a fantastic fit for Denver's rushing scheme that I place an extremely high probability on his selection at #12 overall next Saturday. For a team that struggled mightily in the red zone and in short-yardage situations last season, the players above all have the potential to have a huge impact on Denver's offensive production in 2008 and moving forward.

Rivers Top Gun in West???

Someone please tell me that this article by Denver Post writer Jim Armstrong is just some belated April fools joke. What in the world is this guy talking about?

"Frankly, given the state of the AFC West these days, Rivers has every right to chirp.

When it comes to quarterbacks, Rivers is the man for all seasons in the West. He's the best quarterback in the division and the most experienced. He has won 25-of-32 starts and twice taken the Chargers to the playoffs.

The other starting quarterbacks in the West? For one thing, they have lots of potential. For another . . . um, did we mention they have lots of potential?"


Hmm...let's take a look at some highlights from the 2007 and 2008 pro bowl rosters:

Ladanian Tomlinson (hall of famer) (both years)
Antonio Gates (hall of famer) (both years)
Lorenzo Neal (hall of famer) (both years)
Marcus McNeil OT (both years)
Kris Dielhman OG (2008)
Nick Hardwick C (both years)
Jamal Williams DT (both years)
Shawn Merriman OLB (both years)
Antonio Cromartie CB (2008)
Kassim Osgood ST (both years)
Nate Kaeding K (2007)
David Binn LS (2007)


That's 12 pro bowlers and three hall of famers! And Philip Rivers is top gun, why, because he plays for these guys?

Lets take a look at another set of statistics:







Jay Cutler: Philip Rivers
QB Rating: 88.1QB Rating: 82.4
YPA: 7.5YPA: 6.9
Comp %: 63.6Comp %: 60.2
Total TD: 21Total TD: 22
Total TO's: 18Total TO's: 21
Total Yd's: 3702Total Yd's: 3185


Rivers is the better QB? Really? Last I checked, Cutler didn't hold a clipboard for Drew Brees for 2 years either.

There are few things more annoying than seeing this kind of jabberwocky spewed from the pen of a Denver Broncos beat writer. At least if it were an AP article the Denver Post could feign ignorance.

Of course, no statistic measures class. In that category, Philip Rivers is dead last in the NFL:


Great story Denver Post! Some of you may recall last Saturday I had similar sentiments for "Chief Asshole" Philip Rivers. The video at this link is exactly the same. It's not like there is a paucity of Rivers hate videos on the internet, but after his deplorable behavior week 5, what could possibly make you angrier?

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Saturday Morning Miscellany

Once you choke through a painful lead section which juxtaposes Chad Johnson and Brandon Marshall in nauseating fashion, Mike Klis had a couple of interesting things to say this morning; however, the triviality of what follows is symptomatic of a media starved for material as we impatiently wait for the 2008 NFL Draft to begin in two weeks. Isn't it a shame we don't have some tantalizing headlines to carry through a difficult time?

Marcus Thomas writes a bad check. . . to his mother!



Brandon Marshall recants: McDonald's bag was the true culprit; Marshall sues.



Elway assaulted in dark alley, blames Cutler.



Sundquist on Shanahan: "He must be stopped"



Okay, Klis actually had some things worth mentioning. Here they are:

  • Apparently Texans Offensive Coordinator Kyle Shanahan and father Mike aren't talking right now. The Texan's--who are seven picks removed from Denver on April 26th--feel their draft needs are so similar to Denver's in this years draft that Kyle doesn't want to tip their hand. Consequently, Mike and Kyle have agreed not to talk to each other until May.

  • Former Broncos ILB Al Wilson balked at a contract offer from the Cleveland Browns for the league minimum. According to the article, Wilson feels his pro bowl resume warrants more consideration than $730,000.


  • In defense of Chief Asshole and mediocre Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers, Norv Turner had the following to say:

    "Philip took some heat over some things, yelling from the sideline . . . which was silly," Chargers coach Norv Turner said. "One shot of a guy, people get this opinion, which is so far from the truth. Philip's one of the most grounded people you're ever going to be around."


    "One shot," eh? Did anyone see the Colts playoff game last year? Make no mistake about it Broncos fan, Rivers is to Cutler like Brian Bosworth was to Elway. And like Elway, it will be Cutler who laughs last. Burn this into your memory, so that you are utterly remorseless the next time we destroy the Chargers on the football field:



That's all I've got this morning. Enjoy the beautiful weather!

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Elway's Distracting Comments Out of Line

As I browse through my daily Broncos RSS feeds, my left eye twitches a bit every time I see another saga in the Cutler-Marshall soap opera in which so many of us have become enamored. I'm going to cut to the chase; here's the bottom line: Brandon Marshall behaved like an idiot, he's gonna be ready for training camp, its over. Get over it.

Let's retrace history a bit. Brandon Marshall admits to "slipping on a McDonald's bag" (a lie). The media--smelling one of the centuries stupidest lies--attack like piranha. Just to inject some ethos into this conversation, recall that I was sick of this fiasco on day one. Shortly thereafter, Woody Paige derides Marshall, telling him to "grow up." Let me preface this by saying that I'm not a big Woody Paige fan. He annoys me. But to me, this comment was right on the money. To which Marshall responds in tabloid fashion. Yada, yada, yada...

So what exactly is Jay Cutler supposed to do? Does a team leader defend a guy who just showed up to a DUI hearing in an arm cast? The answer is simple: it's a lose-lose. If he defends Marshall he's not a leader; if he criticizes him, he's too outspoken. Really, I think Cutler spoke eloquently. His reaction was pretty much what you'd expect.

When did John Elway become a part of this conversation? Here were his recent comments on the issue:

"I was surprised to hear it, actually," Elway said Wednesday during his Colorado Crush Arena Football League news conference. "If that's what Jay feels like he needs to comment on, then he needs to do that. I mean, personally, I would have done it to (Marshall). To me, as teammates — even though I've tried to settle things in the press, looking back over the years, it's not been the right way to do it."


Is it just me or do these comments stink of hypocrisy? The message here is "always criticize privately." Oh really, John? I cannot side with the apologists here who will say that Elway is "just a guy" with every right to voice his opinion. I don't buy that. Elway is more than just a former player; he's an institution. In some ways, he's a euphemism for the whole organization. As a leader, an institution, and perhaps a future owner, I would think he'd be less incendiary.

One could argue that it would be less damaging for Bowlen himself to criticize Cutler. Suppose Isiah Thomas were to criticize the coaching ability of Phil Jackson. Would Jackson care? Would anybody listen? Now suppose Alan Greenspan--a (perhaps unwarranted) world-renowned monetary policy hero--steps in front of a microphone and criticizes Ben Bernanke in the middle of a financial crisis (sound familiar?). Bernanke's job just got a whole lot harder. How irresponsible.

Some of my fondest childhood memories are of seeing John Elway's brilliance on the football field. I'm as big an Elway fan as you'll find; but no matter how I rationalize, I simply disagree with his tact in this situation. I think he should heed his own advice and criticize Cutler behind closed doors. Cutler already works hard enough to stay out of Elway's shadow; give the kid a break.

Of course, if the media didn't proliferate this sickeningly-sensationalized soap opera, its reverberations wouldn't be so frustrating. In an age where the most outrageous journalists seem to garner the most 'clicks', this seems to be what sells. Ultimately, the fans have the power to end the conversation: stop reading.

Speaking of Cutler criticism; this video is some of the best criticism of Cutler I've seen. Enjoy!


Jay_Cutler_2007_Video.wmv

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Draft Targets: The Vanderbilt Connection

Fan euphoria surrounding the enormous potential of Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler has been a near-ubiquitous theme at blogs, message boards, and fan sites since we drafted him 11th overall in 2006. What's not to love? In 2007, Cutler tied Payton Manning for the 3rd fewest interceptions among 16-game starters, boasted a respectable 7.5 YPA, and completed over 63% of his passes. Given Denver's overwhelming success with the Vanderbilt alumni, it comes as no surprise to hear that Denver will take a serious look at Cutler's blind-side tackle Chris Williams and favorite target Earl Bennett.

I'd be lying if I said that I shared Broncos fans' infatuation with Bennett and Williams. I think the Williams is a top-shelf talent at tackle--particularly when one considers his competition; however, I'm not overly-excited about spending a 12th overall pick to grab him. Also, I disagree with the assertion that Denver has a desperate need for help at offensive tackle.

In Bennett's case, I don't see a player that evolves into a dominant NFL receiver. His build and technical competencies suggest that he could push a guy like Stokley out of the slot, but many doubt he has the speed to get consistent separation and he doesn't show much flash after the catch. He doesn't have the height to win battles for deep balls and doesn't have elite speed. Bennett's work ethic, character, and relationship with Cutler are intriguing, but ultimately I don't think there's enough to this guy to warrant second round consideration. In short, I like a lot of other receivers better.

Instead of Williams or Bennett, I am going to suggest that Denver takes a long look at another quarterback from Vanderbilt in this years draft. Namely, the quarterback of their defense, ILB Jonathan Goff. Goff is a mean, hard-hitting linebacker with outstanding range. There are zero off-the-field issues, injuries, or other baggage on his resume. Goff is a little stiff in interviews, but he's well spoken and intelligent. On the field, his energy is infectious.

Goff's combine workout bested all of his peers at inside linebacker. He was one of two players to complete the cone drill in under 7 seconds, he had the best time in the 60-yard shuttle, and he missed the best 20-yard shuttle time by 5/100th's of a second. Goff was the strongest inside linebacker with 28 reps, his broad jump was second best, and his 31.5" vertical was third best. Only Jerrod Mayo and Tavares Gooden bested his 4.68 40-time. You won't find a more well-rounded performance in this draft.

At 6'2" 245 lbs. Goff also has the distinction of being the biggest inside linebacker in this year's draft. Many scouts are concerned that he lacks ideal lower body strength. With a 6'2" frame, however, he has the ability to add additional mass. After adding Niko in the off season, Denver can certainly afford to give Goff at least year to pack on some muscle and contribute on special teams.

Goff is technically well rounded. He's a fantastic tackler and shows great closing speed. He takes efficient angles to the ball carrier and shows great lateral agility. In coverage, he's effective in read-and-react zone coverage. He had only 2 interceptions at Vanderbilt but displays above-average ball skills. He probably doesn't have the speed to be elite in man-to-man coverage and would probably struggle against AFC tight ends (further illuminating our need to find an elite strong safety).

From top to bottom, its hard to find a more complete option at middle linebacker available in this year's draft. Rivals has him rated the 100th best player in the draft, which makes him a 4th rounder; ESPN seems to think he'll go in the 6th; and Pro Football Weekly projects him at the bottom of the 6th round. Even for 4th round money, I think Goff is a steal on draft day. I still like Curtis Lofton as an overall prospect, but based on his draft position, Goff is a better value.

Here's a video of Goff for those who are interested:

Monday, March 24, 2008

Bored Media Proliferates Meaningless Story

For those of you who didn't read it at the 63,000 other media sites that can't stop talking about it, Brandon Marshall slipped on a McDonald's wrapper and is in a cast. This is expected to have no impact on his preparedness for the 2008 season.

In related news, his DUI proceedings were postponed. I was going to show you the oft-played film of Brandon Marshall AT his DUI hearing IN his cast (how's that for killing two birds with one stone), but decided I'd rather watch some sick Brandon Marshall highlights instead, enjoy:

The Jay Cutler to Brandon Marshall Show



UPDATE: And so the drama continues. Adam Schefter, Chief NFL propagandist, (the same guy who, falsely, said Eli would miss 6-8 weeks with his separated shoulder in 2007) is reporting that Marshall's injury was (a) not caused by a McDonald's bag and (b) much more serious than originally reported. This will reportedly have no impact on his preparedness for the upcoming season. So relax and watch the sick highlight video.

UPDATE #2: The whole story was fabricated to spare Marshall the humiliation of admitting he was rough-housing with a relative (who knows if that's even the correct story). Anyway, Adam Schefter is exonerated (for now). Marshall's injury was pretty serious, but he's not expected to miss the start of training camp.